RAG Readiness Audit
Score eight dimensions of a content set and receive a readiness level, priority improvements, risk areas, and a suggested 30-day plan.
Directional planning tool, not a formal audit — runs in your browser, performs no retrieval, and makes no accuracy claims.
Documentation organization
3/5URL quality
3/5Duplicate content control
3/5Metadata consistency
3/5Update frequency
3/5Content format consistency
3/5Source traceability
3/5Access constraints
3/5Readiness level
Developing
Score 24 of 40
# RAG readiness — Developing (24/40) ## Priority improvements1. Documentation organization (scored 3/5)2. URL quality (scored 3/5)3. Duplicate content control (scored 3/5) ## Risk areas- Low-scoring dimensions compound: weak deduplication plus inconsistent metadata makes retrieval failures hard to diagnose.- Access constraints cap what any ingest can reach, regardless of other scores. ## Suggested 30-day planWeek 1 — Fix documentation organization; define explicit rules and write them down.Week 2 — Fix url quality; add an assertion that catches regressions.Week 3 — Fix duplicate content control; re-ingest and compare document counts.Week 4 — Build a fixed retrieval question set and run it after every refresh. Directional planning tool, not a formal audit.